Chile vs Iceland: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.9368 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
87th
Iceland rank
88th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • Iceland
0.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9368 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0832 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Chile ranks 87th and Iceland ranks 88th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3933 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7142 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3209 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.4582 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.767 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3089 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.5069 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7149 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.208 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.8199 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6499 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.17 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6925 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3566 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.841 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2111 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9267 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1307 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Iceland?
Chile, at 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9368 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Iceland?
0.0832 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 87th and Iceland ranks 88th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Iceland: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/iceland/">Chile vs Iceland: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,242 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.