Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
87th
Guinea-Bissau rank
86th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • Guinea-Bissau
0.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 87th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 86th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3933 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3393 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.054 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.4582 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4294 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0288 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.5069 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5518 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0449 1000 USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.8476 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7274 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1202 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8382 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2109 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9982 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.054 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0333 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Guinea-Bissau?
0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guinea-Bissau?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 87th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 86th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/guinea-bissau/">Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,242 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.