Australia vs Chad: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Australia
0.3433 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad
0.3352 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
106th
Chad rank
107th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Australia
  • Chad
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.3433 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.3352 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0081 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 106th and Chad ranks 107th of 128 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chad Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2845 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.106 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1785 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.2728 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1033 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1695 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.2429 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1074 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1355 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.3377 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1359 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2018 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.412 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.177 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.235 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.3774 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2451 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1322 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.3557 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3181 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0375 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Australia or Chad?
Australia, at 0.3433 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.3352 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Australia and Chad?
0.0081 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chad?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Chad rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Australia ranks 106th and Chad ranks 107th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chad: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/chad/">Australia vs Chad: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,242 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.