Angola vs Namibia: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Angola
0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
118th
Namibia rank
121st

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Angola
  • Namibia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0205 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Angola ranks 118th and Namibia ranks 121st of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0411 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.045 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0472 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0306 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0165 1000 USD per square kilometre Angola
1980s 0.0527 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0323 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0204 1000 USD per square kilometre Angola
1990s 0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0362 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.018 1000 USD per square kilometre Angola
2000s 0.0622 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0485 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0136 1000 USD per square kilometre Angola
2010s 0.0672 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0528 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0145 1000 USD per square kilometre Angola
2020s 0.0726 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0505 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0222 1000 USD per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Angola or Namibia?
Angola, at 0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Angola and Namibia?
0.0205 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Namibia rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Angola ranks 118th and Namibia ranks 121st of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Namibia: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/namibia/">Angola vs Namibia: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,242 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.