How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Rwanda

0.0088 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.0122 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Rwanda rank

100th

Zimbabwe rank

97th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Rwanda
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0122 1000 USD per person against 0.0088 1000 USD per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0034 1000 USD per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 128 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0038 1000 USD per person	0.0275 1000 USD per person	0.0237 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1970s	0.0045 1000 USD per person	0.0306 1000 USD per person	0.0261 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1980s	0.0074 1000 USD per person	0.0234 1000 USD per person	0.016 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1990s	0.0069 1000 USD per person	0.0213 1000 USD per person	0.0144 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0109 1000 USD per person	0.0132 1000 USD per person	0.0023 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.009 1000 USD per person	0.0123 1000 USD per person	0.0033 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Rwanda or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0122 1000 USD per person against 0.0088 1000 USD per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?: 0.0034 1000 USD per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Rwanda ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/rwanda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/rwanda/zimbabwe/">Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,369 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.