How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chad?

56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bangladesh vs Chad: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Bangladesh

0.0209 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chad

0.021 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Bangladesh rank

85th

Chad rank

84th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Bangladesh
Chad

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.021 1000 USD per person against 0.0209 1000 USD per person in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per person.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 85th and Chad ranks 84th of 128 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bangladesh	Chad	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.004 1000 USD per person	0.0396 1000 USD per person	0.0355 1000 USD per person	Chad
1970s	0.0039 1000 USD per person	0.0318 1000 USD per person	0.0279 1000 USD per person	Chad
1980s	0.0033 1000 USD per person	0.0267 1000 USD per person	0.0235 1000 USD per person	Chad
1990s	0.0035 1000 USD per person	0.024 1000 USD per person	0.0205 1000 USD per person	Chad
2000s	0.0037 1000 USD per person	0.0221 1000 USD per person	0.0184 1000 USD per person	Chad
2010s	0.0094 1000 USD per person	0.0213 1000 USD per person	0.0119 1000 USD per person	Chad
2020s	0.0184 1000 USD per person	0.0218 1000 USD per person	0.0034 1000 USD per person	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Bangladesh or Chad?: Chad, at 0.021 1000 USD per person against 0.0209 1000 USD per person in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Bangladesh and Chad?: 0.0001 1000 USD per person, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chad?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Chad rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Bangladesh ranks 85th and Chad ranks 84th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Chad: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bangladesh/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bangladesh/chad/">Bangladesh vs Chad: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,369 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.