Libya vs Namibia: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Libya
0.0612 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
149th
Namibia rank
151st

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
0.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.0612 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Libya ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 151st of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0487 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0352 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
1990s 0.0441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 0.0507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 0.0609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Libya or Namibia?
Libya, at 0.0612 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Libya and Namibia?
0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Libya ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 151st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,308 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.