Jamaica vs Japan: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Jamaica
8.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
8.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
33rd
Japan rank
36th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Japan
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 8.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Jamaica ranks 33rd and Japan ranks 36th of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 7.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 7.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 8.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 8.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1682 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Jamaica or Japan?
Jamaica, at 8.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Jamaica and Japan?
0.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Japan rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Jamaica ranks 33rd and Japan ranks 36th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Japan: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/japan/">Jamaica vs Japan: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,308 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.