Iraq vs Zimbabwe: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Iraq
0.3885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.4767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
124th
Zimbabwe rank
121st

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Iraq
  • Zimbabwe
0.20.30.40.50.60.7196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.4767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 0.0882 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2869 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2631 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 0.6514 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4298 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 0.632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4626 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 0.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4623 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.4628 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 0.331 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.3768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0833 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Iraq or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.4767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Iraq and Zimbabwe?
0.0882 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Zimbabwe rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Iraq ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Zimbabwe: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iraq/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iraq/zimbabwe/">Iraq vs Zimbabwe: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,308 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.