Eswatini vs Malawi: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Eswatini
0.9817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
99th
Malawi rank
96th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Malawi
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 99th and Malawi ranks 96th of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5726 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.7573 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.9315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.174 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.9068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.9499 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.9538 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1929 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.9327 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0815 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Eswatini or Malawi?
Malawi, at 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Eswatini and Malawi?
0.0983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Malawi rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Eswatini ranks 99th and Malawi ranks 96th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Malawi: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/malawi/">Eswatini vs Malawi: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,308 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.