Ecuador vs Jordan: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Ecuador
3.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
3.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
62nd
Jordan rank
63rd

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Jordan
01234196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 62nd and Jordan ranks 63rd of 164 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8741 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2974 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2677 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9323 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 2.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 3.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 3.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Ecuador or Jordan?
Ecuador, at 3.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Ecuador and Jordan?
0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Jordan ranks 63rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Jordan: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jordan/">Ecuador vs Jordan: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,308 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.