China vs Guatemala: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

China
2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
77th
Guatemala rank
76th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • China
  • Guatemala
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

China ranks 77th and Guatemala ranks 76th of 164 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8905 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.2376 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.4497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6457 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 1.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2146 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), China or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between China and Guatemala?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Guatemala rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
China ranks 77th and Guatemala ranks 76th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Guatemala: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/guatemala/">China vs Guatemala: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,308 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.