Chile vs Kuwait: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait
1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
94th
Kuwait rank
92nd

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • Kuwait
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 94th and Kuwait ranks 92nd of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Kuwait in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4784 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.5582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.446 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.6179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.304 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kuwait
1990s 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.317 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9979 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2834 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kuwait
2020s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Kuwait?
0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kuwait?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Kuwait rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 94th and Kuwait ranks 92nd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Kuwait: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/kuwait/">Chile vs Kuwait: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,308 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.