Chad vs Mauritania: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad
0.1731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.1717 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
137th
Mauritania rank
138th

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chad
  • Mauritania
0.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.1731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1717 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Chad ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 164 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0525 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1970s 0.0522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 0.0541 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0.0692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0603 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0.0907 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 0.1264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.1643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1707 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Mauritania?
Chad, at 0.1731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1717 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Mauritania?
0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mauritania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mauritania rank globally for milk, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chad ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mauritania: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/milk-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/mauritania/">Chad vs Mauritania: Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,308 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.