Ecuador vs Kazakhstan: Meat, Total — Production, per capita
Ecuador
0.0571 t per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0.0568 t per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
40th
Kazakhstan rank
42nd
Meat, Total — Production, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0571 t per person against 0.0568 t per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 40th and Kazakhstan ranks 42nd of 171 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0317 t per person | 0.0571 t per person | 0.0254 t per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.0412 t per person | 0.0423 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.0515 t per person | 0.0444 t per person | 0.0071 t per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0533 t per person | 0.0534 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat, total — production, per capita, Ecuador or Kazakhstan?
- Ecuador, at 0.0571 t per person against 0.0568 t per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat, total — production, per capita between Ecuador and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Kazakhstan rank globally for meat, total — production, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 40th and Kazakhstan ranks 42nd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat, Total — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat, Total — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.