Solomon Islands vs Syria: Meat supply per person
Solomon Islands
15.62 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Syria
16.23 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Solomon Islands rank
163rd
Syria rank
161st
Meat supply per person over time
- Solomon Islands
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 16.23 kilograms per year per capita against 15.62 kilograms per year per capita in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.61 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Syria has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 163rd and Syria ranks 161st of 192 countries.
Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.77 kilograms per year per capita | 18.4 kilograms per year per capita | 4.63 kilograms per year per capita | Syria |
| 2020s | 15.18 kilograms per year per capita | 16.96 kilograms per year per capita | 1.78 kilograms per year per capita | Syria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply per person, Solomon Islands or Syria?
- Syria, at 16.23 kilograms per year per capita against 15.62 kilograms per year per capita in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply per person between Solomon Islands and Syria?
- 0.61 kilograms per year per capita, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Syria?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Solomon Islands and Syria rank globally for meat supply per person?
- Solomon Islands ranks 163rd and Syria ranks 161st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.