Qatar vs Seychelles: Meat supply per person
Qatar
71.43 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Seychelles
70.69 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Qatar rank
62nd
Seychelles rank
64th
Meat supply per person over time
- Qatar
- Seychelles
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 71.43 kilograms per year per capita against 70.69 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles, a difference of 0.74 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 62nd and Seychelles ranks 64th of 192 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 80.24 kilograms per year per capita | 57.62 kilograms per year per capita | 22.62 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
| 2020s | 79.95 kilograms per year per capita | 65.7 kilograms per year per capita | 14.25 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply per person, Qatar or Seychelles?
- Qatar, at 71.43 kilograms per year per capita against 70.69 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply per person between Qatar and Seychelles?
- 0.74 kilograms per year per capita, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Seychelles?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Qatar and Seychelles rank globally for meat supply per person?
- Qatar ranks 62nd and Seychelles ranks 64th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.