Italy vs Seychelles: Meat supply per person
Italy
71.2 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Seychelles
70.69 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Italy rank
63rd
Seychelles rank
64th
Meat supply per person over time
- Italy
- Seychelles
How they compare
Italy currently reports 71.2 kilograms per year per capita against 70.69 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles, a difference of 0.51 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 63rd and Seychelles ranks 64th of 192 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81.28 kilograms per year per capita | 54.76 kilograms per year per capita | 26.52 kilograms per year per capita | Italy |
| 2020s | 72.38 kilograms per year per capita | 65.7 kilograms per year per capita | 6.68 kilograms per year per capita | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply per person, Italy or Seychelles?
- Italy, at 71.2 kilograms per year per capita against 70.69 kilograms per year per capita in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply per person between Italy and Seychelles?
- 0.51 kilograms per year per capita, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Seychelles?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Seychelles rank globally for meat supply per person?
- Italy ranks 63rd and Seychelles ranks 64th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.