Comoros vs Namibia: Meat supply per person
Comoros
26.59 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Namibia
24.19 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Comoros rank
140th
Namibia rank
143rd
Meat supply per person over time
- Comoros
- Namibia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 26.59 kilograms per year per capita against 24.19 kilograms per year per capita in Namibia, a difference of 2.4 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Comoros ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.58 kilograms per year per capita | 29.43 kilograms per year per capita | 8.85 kilograms per year per capita | Namibia |
| 2020s | 28 kilograms per year per capita | 28.62 kilograms per year per capita | 0.6201 kilograms per year per capita | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply per person, Comoros or Namibia?
- Comoros, at 26.59 kilograms per year per capita against 24.19 kilograms per year per capita in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply per person between Comoros and Namibia?
- 2.4 kilograms per year per capita, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Namibia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Namibia rank globally for meat supply per person?
- Comoros ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.