Bolivia vs Tuvalu: Meat supply per person
Bolivia
84.43 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tuvalu
85.07 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bolivia rank
38th
Tuvalu rank
35th
Meat supply per person over time
- Bolivia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 85.07 kilograms per year per capita against 84.43 kilograms per year per capita in Bolivia, a difference of 0.64 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Bolivia ranks 38th and Tuvalu ranks 35th of 192 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 79.78 kilograms per year per capita | 83.15 kilograms per year per capita | 3.37 kilograms per year per capita | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 80.74 kilograms per year per capita | 84.21 kilograms per year per capita | 3.47 kilograms per year per capita | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply per person, Bolivia or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 85.07 kilograms per year per capita against 84.43 kilograms per year per capita in Bolivia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply per person between Bolivia and Tuvalu?
- 0.64 kilograms per year per capita, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Tuvalu?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bolivia and Tuvalu rank globally for meat supply per person?
- Bolivia ranks 38th and Tuvalu ranks 35th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.