French Polynesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita

French Polynesia
0.0028 1000 An per person
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0027 1000 An per person
in 2024
French Polynesia rank
114th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
115th

Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.0020.0040.006196119922024

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.0028 1000 An per person against 0.0027 1000 An per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0001 1000 An per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 114th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 115th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0013 1000 An per person 0.0007 1000 An per person 0.0006 1000 An per person French Polynesia
1970s 0.0034 1000 An per person 0.0011 1000 An per person 0.0023 1000 An per person French Polynesia
1980s 0.0038 1000 An per person 0.002 1000 An per person 0.0018 1000 An per person French Polynesia
1990s 0.0034 1000 An per person 0.0036 1000 An per person 0.0003 1000 An per person Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0029 1000 An per person 0.0054 1000 An per person 0.0025 1000 An per person Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0026 1000 An per person 0.0044 1000 An per person 0.0018 1000 An per person Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0027 1000 An per person 0.0038 1000 An per person 0.0011 1000 An per person Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat, poultry — producing animals/slaughtered, per capita, French Polynesia or Sao Tome and Principe?
French Polynesia, at 0.0028 1000 An per person against 0.0027 1000 An per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat, poultry — producing animals/slaughtered, per capita between French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0001 1000 An per person, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for meat, poultry — producing animals/slaughtered, per capita?
French Polynesia ranks 114th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 115th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-poultry-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/french-polynesia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-poultry-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/french-polynesia/sao-tome-and-principe/">French Polynesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
1000 An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,840 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.