Congo vs Poland: Meat, Other — Losses

Congo
0 1000 t
in 2019
Poland
0 1000 t
in 2023
Congo rank
3rd
Poland rank
3rd

Meat, Other — Losses over time

  • Congo
  • Poland
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Poland, a difference of 0 1000 t.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 3rd of 15 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat, other — losses, Congo or Poland?
Congo, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Poland as of 2019.
What is the difference in meat, other — losses between Congo and Poland?
0 1000 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Poland?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo and Poland rank globally for meat, other — losses?
Congo ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 3rd of 15 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat, Other — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meat, Other — Losses
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
36 places, 316 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.