Belgium vs Eswatini: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita
Belgium
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
118th
Eswatini rank
116th
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita over time
- Belgium
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 118th and Eswatini ranks 116th of 160 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per capita, Belgium or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per capita between Belgium and Eswatini?
- 0 t per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eswatini?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Eswatini rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per capita?
- Belgium ranks 118th and Eswatini ranks 116th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.