Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per

Belarus
0.3324 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.347 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
127th
Equatorial Guinea rank
126th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per over time

  • Belarus
  • Equatorial Guinea
0.250.50.7511.21.5196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.347 An per square kilometre against 0.3324 An per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0146 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 127th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th of 160 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 1.02 An per square kilometre 0.2834 An per square kilometre 0.7412 An per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.4141 An per square kilometre 0.3091 An per square kilometre 0.105 An per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.3532 An per square kilometre 0.3297 An per square kilometre 0.0235 An per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.3603 An per square kilometre 0.3442 An per square kilometre 0.0161 An per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered, per, Belarus or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.347 An per square kilometre against 0.3324 An per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered, per between Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0146 An per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered, per?
Belarus ranks 127th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/belarus/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/belarus/equatorial-guinea/">Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.