How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Italy?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Italy: Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US unit

Brazil

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Italy

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Brazil rank

81st

Italy rank

78th

Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US unit over time

Brazil
Italy

How they compare

Italy currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Brazil, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.

Brazil ranks 81st and Italy ranks 78th of 118 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Italy	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Italy
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Italy
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Italy
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Italy
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Italy
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Brazil or Italy?: Italy, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Brazil as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Brazil and Italy?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Italy?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Brazil and Italy rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?: Brazil ranks 81st and Italy ranks 78th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Italy: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-9/brazil/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-9/brazil/italy/">Brazil vs Italy: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 119 places, 6,105 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.