How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Italy?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Italy: Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US capita

Barbados

0.0023 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Italy

0.0023 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Barbados rank

53rd

Italy rank

55th

Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US capita over time

Barbados
Italy

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0023 1000 USD per person against 0.0023 1000 USD per person in Italy, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.

Barbados ranks 53rd and Italy ranks 55th of 118 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Italy	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0023 1000 USD per person	0.0045 1000 USD per person	0.0022 1000 USD per person	Italy
1970s	0.0036 1000 USD per person	0.0048 1000 USD per person	0.0012 1000 USD per person	Italy
1980s	0.004 1000 USD per person	0.0062 1000 USD per person	0.0022 1000 USD per person	Italy
1990s	0.0016 1000 USD per person	0.0063 1000 USD per person	0.0047 1000 USD per person	Italy
2000s	0.002 1000 USD per person	0.0049 1000 USD per person	0.0029 1000 USD per person	Italy
2010s	0.0027 1000 USD per person	0.0027 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Barbados or Italy?: Barbados, at 0.0023 1000 USD per person against 0.0023 1000 USD per person in Italy as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Barbados and Italy?: 0 1000 USD per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Italy?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Barbados and Italy rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?: Barbados ranks 53rd and Italy ranks 55th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Italy: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-8/barbados/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-8/barbados/italy/">Barbados vs Italy: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 119 places, 6,503 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.