Mexico vs Pakistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Mexico
1.28 % change on previous year
in 2024
Pakistan
1.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mexico rank
71st
Pakistan rank
73rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Mexico
  • Pakistan
-40-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 1.28 % change on previous year against 1.2 % change on previous year in Pakistan, a difference of 0.08 % change on previous year.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Pakistan ahead.

Mexico ranks 71st and Pakistan ranks 73rd of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 4 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 1.23 % change on previous year 3.06 % change on previous year 1.84 % change on previous year Pakistan
1970s -0.6786 % change on previous year 6.47 % change on previous year 7.14 % change on previous year Pakistan
1980s 0.1016 % change on previous year 3.77 % change on previous year 3.67 % change on previous year Pakistan
1990s 3.39 % change on previous year -0.1607 % change on previous year 3.55 % change on previous year Mexico
2000s 9.26 % change on previous year 3.88 % change on previous year 5.37 % change on previous year Mexico
2010s 2.06 % change on previous year 1.15 % change on previous year 0.9096 % change on previous year Mexico
2020s 1.64 % change on previous year 1.22 % change on previous year 0.4194 % change on previous year Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Mexico or Pakistan?
Mexico, at 1.28 % change on previous year against 1.2 % change on previous year in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Mexico and Pakistan?
0.08 % change on previous year, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Mexico and Pakistan rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Mexico ranks 71st and Pakistan ranks 73rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Pakistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/mexico/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/mexico/pakistan/">Mexico vs Pakistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,074 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.