Japan vs Mauritania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Japan
3.06 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritania
3.11 % change on previous year
in 2024
Japan rank
49th
Mauritania rank
48th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Japan
  • Mauritania
-50050100150200196219932024

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 3.11 % change on previous year against 3.06 % change on previous year in Japan, a difference of 0.05 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Mauritania ahead.

Japan ranks 49th and Mauritania ranks 48th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s -23.52 % change on previous year 1.8 % change on previous year 25.32 % change on previous year Mauritania
1970s -15.12 % change on previous year 1.87 % change on previous year 16.99 % change on previous year Mauritania
1980s 33.14 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year 31.83 % change on previous year Japan
1990s -4.32 % change on previous year 5.91 % change on previous year 10.23 % change on previous year Mauritania
2000s 1.51 % change on previous year 1.23 % change on previous year 0.2731 % change on previous year Japan
2010s 2.62 % change on previous year 5.66 % change on previous year 3.04 % change on previous year Mauritania
2020s 4.3 % change on previous year 3.51 % change on previous year 0.7904 % change on previous year Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Japan or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 3.11 % change on previous year against 3.06 % change on previous year in Japan as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Japan and Mauritania?
0.05 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Japan and Mauritania rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Japan ranks 49th and Mauritania ranks 48th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Mauritania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/japan/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/japan/mauritania/">Japan vs Mauritania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,074 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.