Brazil vs Guatemala: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Brazil
0.4972 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala
0.3174 % change on previous year
in 2024
Brazil rank
86th
Guatemala rank
88th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Brazil
  • Guatemala
-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.4972 % change on previous year against 0.3174 % change on previous year in Guatemala, a difference of 0.1798 % change on previous year.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.6 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Guatemala ahead.

Brazil ranks 86th and Guatemala ranks 88th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 4.65 % change on previous year 0.1247 % change on previous year 4.53 % change on previous year Brazil
1970s -0.6868 % change on previous year 1.59 % change on previous year 2.27 % change on previous year Guatemala
1980s 10.64 % change on previous year -2.41 % change on previous year 13.05 % change on previous year Brazil
1990s -0.6217 % change on previous year -4.85 % change on previous year 4.23 % change on previous year Brazil
2000s 1.41 % change on previous year 11.7 % change on previous year 10.29 % change on previous year Guatemala
2010s 2.21 % change on previous year 0.3736 % change on previous year 1.83 % change on previous year Brazil
2020s 2.06 % change on previous year 0.481 % change on previous year 1.58 % change on previous year Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Brazil or Guatemala?
Brazil, at 0.4972 % change on previous year against 0.3174 % change on previous year in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Brazil and Guatemala?
0.1798 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Guatemala rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Brazil ranks 86th and Guatemala ranks 88th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Guatemala: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/brazil/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/brazil/guatemala/">Brazil vs Guatemala: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,074 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.