Australia and New Zealand vs Belgium: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Australia and New Zealand
7.86 % change on previous year
in 2024
Belgium
8.36 % change on previous year
in 2017
Australia and New Zealand rank
32nd
Belgium rank
29th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Belgium
-100-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 8.36 % change on previous year against 7.86 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.5 % change on previous year.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Belgium ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 32nd and Belgium ranks 29th of 194 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Belgium in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Belgium Difference Ahead
2000s -0.5309 % change on previous year -18.7 % change on previous year 18.16 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2010s 1.41 % change on previous year 17.1 % change on previous year 15.69 % change on previous year Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Australia and New Zealand or Belgium?
Belgium, at 8.36 % change on previous year against 7.86 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Australia and New Zealand and Belgium?
0.5 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belgium?
13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Belgium rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 32nd and Belgium ranks 29th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Belgium: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/australia-and-new-zealand/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/australia-and-new-zealand/belgium/">Australia and New Zealand vs Belgium: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,074 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.