Argentina vs Iceland: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Argentina
-5.19 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iceland
-5.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Argentina rank
139th
Iceland rank
140th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Argentina
  • Iceland
-50-250255075196219932024

How they compare

Argentina currently reports -5.19 % change on previous year against -5.2 % change on previous year in Iceland, a difference of 0.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Iceland ahead.

Argentina ranks 139th and Iceland ranks 140th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 2.43 % change on previous year 0.0656 % change on previous year 2.36 % change on previous year Argentina
1970s -3.37 % change on previous year 2.31 % change on previous year 5.68 % change on previous year Iceland
1980s -4.16 % change on previous year -4.72 % change on previous year 0.5653 % change on previous year Argentina
1990s -5.12 % change on previous year -0.9869 % change on previous year 4.14 % change on previous year Iceland
2000s 2.84 % change on previous year 0.38 % change on previous year 2.46 % change on previous year Argentina
2010s 3.48 % change on previous year 1.01 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year Argentina
2020s -6.69 % change on previous year -3.87 % change on previous year 2.82 % change on previous year Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Argentina or Iceland?
Argentina, at -5.19 % change on previous year against -5.2 % change on previous year in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Argentina and Iceland?
0.01 % change on previous year, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Iceland rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Argentina ranks 139th and Iceland ranks 140th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Iceland: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/argentina/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/argentina/iceland/">Argentina vs Iceland: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,074 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.