Malta vs Romania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Malta
1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Romania
1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Malta rank
20th
Romania rank
23rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Malta
  • Romania
01234196119892017

How they compare

Malta currently reports 1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 20th and Romania ranks 23rd of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 4 and Romania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 2.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.3456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.6746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Malta or Romania?
Malta, at 1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Romania as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Malta and Romania?
0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Romania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Malta and Romania rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Malta ranks 20th and Romania ranks 23rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Romania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/malta/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/malta/romania/">Malta vs Romania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.