Eswatini vs Qatar: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Eswatini
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
156th
Qatar rank
156th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Eswatini
  • Qatar
0123196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.

Eswatini ranks 156th and Qatar ranks 156th of 160 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1737 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar
1970s 0.0616 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0612 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar
1980s 0.0564 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar
1990s 0.0237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar
2000s 0.0275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0344 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0344 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Eswatini or Qatar?
Eswatini, at 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Eswatini and Qatar?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Qatar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Qatar rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Eswatini ranks 156th and Qatar ranks 156th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Qatar: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/eswatini/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/eswatini/qatar/">Eswatini vs Qatar: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.