China vs Romania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

China
1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
China rank
25th
Romania rank
23rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • China
  • Romania
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

China ranks 25th and Romania ranks 23rd of 160 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.1611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.4754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.8508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3143 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, China or Romania?
Romania, at 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between China and Romania?
0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Romania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do China and Romania rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
China ranks 25th and Romania ranks 23rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Romania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/china/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/china/romania/">China vs Romania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.