Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
156th
Eswatini rank
156th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Eswatini
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 156th and Eswatini ranks 156th of 160 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0488 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.0692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.0326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Eswatini?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 156th and Eswatini ranks 156th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/bosnia-and-herzegovina/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/bosnia-and-herzegovina/eswatini/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.