Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Belarus
0.023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
122nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
125th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Belarus
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 122nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th of 160 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0832 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0684 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Belarus or Equatorial Guinea?
Belarus, at 0.023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Belarus ranks 122nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/belarus/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/belarus/equatorial-guinea/">Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.