El Salvador vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

El Salvador
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
El Salvador rank
146th
Papua New Guinea rank
149th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • El Salvador
  • Papua New Guinea
0000196119922024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 2.0 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 146th and Papua New Guinea ranks 149th of 160 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person El Salvador
1970s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person El Salvador
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person El Salvador
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person El Salvador
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person El Salvador
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person El Salvador
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, El Salvador or Papua New Guinea?
El Salvador, at 0 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between El Salvador and Papua New Guinea?
0 1000 Int$ per person, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
El Salvador ranks 146th and Papua New Guinea ranks 149th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-4/el-salvador/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-4/el-salvador/papua-new-guinea/">El Salvador vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,985 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.