Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Malaysia: Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US annual
Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US annual over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 22.73 % change on previous year against 3.38 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 19.35 % change on previous year.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 6.7 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Malaysia ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and Malaysia ranks 9th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.41 % change on previous year | 59.02 % change on previous year | 55.61 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 1.92 % change on previous year | 37.17 % change on previous year | 35.26 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 3.13 % change on previous year | 32.54 % change on previous year | 29.41 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 1990s | -1.81 % change on previous year | -41.31 % change on previous year | 39.5 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 1.48 % change on previous year | -55.39 % change on previous year | 56.86 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 4.01 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 104.01 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 2.43 % change on previous year | 114.53 % change on previous year | 112.1 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 22.73 % change on previous year against 3.38 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Malaysia?
- 19.35 % change on previous year, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Malaysia?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Malaysia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and Malaysia ranks 9th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.