How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tajikistan?

25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Tajikistan: Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US square

Malta

1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Tajikistan

1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Malta rank

28th

Tajikistan rank

25th

Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US square over time

Malta
Tajikistan

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.2 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 28th and Tajikistan ranks 25th of 118 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Tajikistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.5464 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1591 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3874 1000 USD per square kilometre	Malta
2000s	1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3151 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7233 1000 USD per square kilometre	Malta
2010s	1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.6643 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4537 1000 USD per square kilometre	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Malta or Tajikistan?: Tajikistan, at 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Malta and Tajikistan?: 0.2 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tajikistan?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
How do Malta and Tajikistan rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?: Malta ranks 28th and Tajikistan ranks 25th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Tajikistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-10/malta/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-10/malta/tajikistan/">Malta vs Tajikistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 119 places, 6,413 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.