Finland vs Namibia: Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US square

Finland
0.0172 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Namibia
0.0231 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
95th
Namibia rank
94th

Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … US square over time

  • Finland
  • Namibia
0.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0231 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0172 1000 USD per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0059 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 94th of 118 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.019 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0243 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0147 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0294 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0147 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0146 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0215 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0068 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0157 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.015 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.0087 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0207 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.012 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0243 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Finland or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0231 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0172 1000 USD per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Finland and Namibia?
0.0059 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Namibia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Namibia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Finland ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 94th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Namibia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-10/finland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-10/finland/namibia/">Finland vs Namibia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
119 places, 6,413 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.