How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Namibia: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US unit

Iceland

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Namibia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Iceland rank

73rd

Namibia rank

75th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US unit over time

Iceland
Namibia

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 73rd and Namibia ranks 75th of 114 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Iceland or Namibia?: Iceland, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Iceland and Namibia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Iceland ranks 73rd and Namibia ranks 75th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 115 places, 6,028 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.