How many years of comparable data are there for France and Rwanda?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

France vs Rwanda: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US unit

France

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Rwanda

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

France rank

58th

Rwanda rank

59th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US unit over time

France
Rwanda

How they compare

France currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.

France ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 59th of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, France averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	France	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	France
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	France
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	France
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, France or Rwanda?: France, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between France and Rwanda?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Rwanda?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do France and Rwanda rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: France ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 59th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/france/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/france/rwanda/">France vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 115 places, 6,028 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.