Equatorial Guinea vs India: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US unit

Equatorial Guinea
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
India
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
102nd
India rank
100th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US unit over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • India
0000196119922024

How they compare

India currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes India's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 102nd and India ranks 100th of 114 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and India in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea India Difference Ahead
1960s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP India
2010s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP India
2020s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or India?
India, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and India?
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and India?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and India rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 102nd and India ranks 100th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs India: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/equatorial-guinea/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/equatorial-guinea/india/">Equatorial Guinea vs India: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
115 places, 6,028 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.