How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malta?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Malta: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US capita

Ecuador

0.0265 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malta

0.0272 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Ecuador rank

44th

Malta rank

43rd

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US capita over time

Ecuador
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0272 1000 USD per person against 0.0265 1000 USD per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Ecuador ranks 44th and Malta ranks 43rd of 114 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0118 1000 USD per person	0.0201 1000 USD per person	0.0083 1000 USD per person	Malta
1970s	0.0122 1000 USD per person	0.0341 1000 USD per person	0.0219 1000 USD per person	Malta
1980s	0.0148 1000 USD per person	0.038 1000 USD per person	0.0232 1000 USD per person	Malta
1990s	0.0171 1000 USD per person	0.065 1000 USD per person	0.048 1000 USD per person	Malta
2000s	0.0173 1000 USD per person	0.0597 1000 USD per person	0.0424 1000 USD per person	Malta
2010s	0.018 1000 USD per person	0.0373 1000 USD per person	0.0193 1000 USD per person	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Ecuador or Malta?: Malta, at 0.0272 1000 USD per person against 0.0265 1000 USD per person in Ecuador as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Ecuador and Malta?: 0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malta?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Ecuador and Malta rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Ecuador ranks 44th and Malta ranks 43rd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malta: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/ecuador/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/ecuador/malta/">Ecuador vs Malta: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 115 places, 6,388 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.