Colombia vs Eswatini: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Colombia
6.7 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini
7.37 % change on previous year
in 2024
Colombia rank
28th
Eswatini rank
25th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Colombia
  • Eswatini
-200204060196219932024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 7.37 % change on previous year against 6.7 % change on previous year in Colombia, a difference of 0.67 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 33 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 28th and Eswatini ranks 25th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s -1.32 % change on previous year 2.23 % change on previous year 3.54 % change on previous year Eswatini
1970s 3.88 % change on previous year 5.4 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s 2.24 % change on previous year 1.72 % change on previous year 0.5127 % change on previous year Colombia
1990s 0.6776 % change on previous year 3.9 % change on previous year 3.22 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 5.17 % change on previous year 0.4661 % change on previous year 4.7 % change on previous year Colombia
2010s 11.32 % change on previous year 4.14 % change on previous year 7.17 % change on previous year Colombia
2020s 6.89 % change on previous year 2.45 % change on previous year 4.44 % change on previous year Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Colombia or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 7.37 % change on previous year against 6.7 % change on previous year in Colombia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Colombia and Eswatini?
0.67 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Eswatini?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Colombia and Eswatini rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Colombia ranks 28th and Eswatini ranks 25th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Eswatini: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/colombia/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/colombia/eswatini/">Colombia vs Eswatini: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 12,228 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.