Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 129th of 150 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 129th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.