Cuba vs New Zealand: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Cuba
0.3249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.3374 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
87th
New Zealand rank
86th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Cuba
  • New Zealand
012345196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.3374 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 150 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2664 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.8126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2806 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3165 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9739 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 1.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 2.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3659 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 2.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Cuba or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.3374 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Cuba and New Zealand?
0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Cuba ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Zealand: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/cuba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/cuba/new-zealand/">Cuba vs New Zealand: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,433 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.