Barbados vs China: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Barbados
12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China
12.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
7th
China rank
6th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Barbados
  • China
0102030196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 12.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 7th and China ranks 6th of 150 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1960s 11.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 20.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 18.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 21.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 18.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 13.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 10.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 12.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 12.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Barbados or China?
China, at 12.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Barbados and China?
0.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Barbados ranks 7th and China ranks 6th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,433 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.