Equatorial Guinea vs Israel: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Equatorial Guinea
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Israel
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
137th
Israel rank
134th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Israel
0000196119922024

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 137th and Israel ranks 134th of 150 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Israel in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Israel
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Israel
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or Israel?
Israel, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and Israel?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Israel?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Israel rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 137th and Israel ranks 134th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Israel: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-5/equatorial-guinea/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-5/equatorial-guinea/israel/">Equatorial Guinea vs Israel: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,056 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.