Central African Republic vs Malawi: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Central African Republic
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi
0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
3rd
Malawi rank
1st

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Malawi
00000196119922024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malawi's figure about 5.0 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 3rd and Malawi ranks 1st of 150 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Malawi Difference Ahead
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Central African Republic or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Central African Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Central African Republic and Malawi?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Malawi?
40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Malawi rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Central African Republic ranks 3rd and Malawi ranks 1st of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Malawi: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-5/central-african-republic/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-5/central-african-republic/malawi/">Central African Republic vs Malawi: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,056 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.